The Four Spent the Day Together by author Chris Kraus – An Iconic Writer Attempts Fresh Territory
The new book features protagonists seeking fresh starts, trying to break free from addictions or toxic relationships, only to find hope curdling into aggression. Kraus repeatedly invokes the phrase "new beginning", rendering it deliberately jaded through constant reiteration. Sentences like "He could make a fresh start" and "They decided to make a fresh start" are scattered across the story. And yet, the author herself is embarking on her own fresh start, because this presents as a new kind of book – fact-based, authentically narrative. However it proves to be laden with the recurring issues and aesthetics as earlier books.
From Accidental Writer to Cult Classic
Kraus was originally an creative who became a writer unintentionally with her 1997 seminal work I Love Dick, structured as epistles to an unresponsive love interest, transforming intimate women's literature from humiliation into defiance. She kept producing books, but the next trio of engaging and challenging novels did not possess the shock and immediacy that the correspondence format imparted to the voice of I Love Dick. Compounding this was her identity as a maverick maker who had become a extensive real estate holder, so there was much discussion on property transactions. It makes sense that she presently aims to experiment with new kinds of material, directing her gaze to the experiences of others, at a period in which she asserts that contemporary political climate renders personal narrative obsolete.
Three Generations, Shared Inescapable History
The Four Spent the Day Together is divided into three sections, encompassing several time periods – none able to break free from their backgrounds. We encounter the tale of a couple named Emma and Jasper, representations of her own mother and father, transitioning from the Bronx to rural Connecticut. Then there is the account of Kraus, in the persona of a figure named Catt Greene, reckoning with the late recognition of I Love Dick, the rise of Trump, and her substance-dependent spouse Paul. The third thread involves the account of a killing of one directionless individual by another in a locality long abandoned by liberal ideals only 80 miles from the protagonist's home in rural Minnesota.
As a reader attracted to refined literature of the kind Kraus typically rejects, I was enchanted by the narrative style of the opening part.
As someone who reads who appreciates precise prose of the kind that the author often disregards, I was seduced by the literary tone of the initial part. It possesses a novel degree of detail that accommodates trivial aspects, like the bucket that the protagonist as a child pries out of frozen water at the beginning of the narrative, helped by her adored dad. "I discovered a frozen plaything!" she exclaims; "a nice toy", he answers, "the nuanced interpretations of terms rolling around in their mouths like sweet treats". She tells the tale of Emma with interest and closeness. "It seemed to Emma she had entered a dream – not precisely her dream."
Frustration and Disruption
I was fated to feel let down when I wished this fresh tone could persist to the end. Kraus notes here that she dislikes the satisfaction readers like me have taken from I Love Dick; she's committed to fragmentation, to the unpolished style she has in common with her inspiration author Kathy Acker, and the blankness and repetitiveness of her previous novels returns in the central part. The protagonist is attempting to do up three dozen dilapidated units in the most troubled areas of Albuquerque while traveling between Minnesota and LA, unable to aid Paul curb his addiction. She is overwhelmed as Paul cycles through poorly supported positions as an addiction therapist in a society fueled by the hostility and dread that underpins a political win. A significant portion discusses about Catt being cancelled on Twitter, her listed profession modified from "author" to "landlord" on a reference site. Kraus still seems to invest excessive emotion about this. On one occasion she remarks that she's researching the homicide so that before exiting the region, "she might be able to learn something about an the United States that her online critics would fail to comprehend, would overlook entirely".
The Murder Narrative
So then we come to the actual killing – and the referenced day spent by the victim with the killer and his associates. Kraus utilizes excellent raw material, and details moment by moment what transpired when the victim Brandon came to see Brittney after encountering her on a platform where she sold sex pictures. He sought a sexual encounter but seems amiably to have occupied the day in the company of her associates, loitering fixing his automobile and covering the cost of food and substances, before being shot by Brittney's boyfriend Micah – a youth with psychological issues who has repeatedly received inpatient care for aggressive outbursts.
Preoccupation and Open Ends
The protagonist becomes fixated by the narrative, and I was fascinated by the way that her twin drives towards ethical reporting and reckless transgression wrestle in this part. But I'd have liked her to go further into her personal fixations here. The compelling persona is the character Brittney, who comes alive partially because of Catt seeing herself in her – a similarly gifted, tormented individual derailing in a difficult, overlooked locality. Kraus notes that Catt converses with Brittney in prison, but she omits the dramatization of these talks. This entire part feels oddly unfinished, to the point that Kraus's narration ends almost mid-par